Entries Tagged as ''

In Favor of New Year’s Resolutions

By Harry R. Jackson, Jr.

Many of us are looking forward to 2010 and thinking about what resolutions we will make. We are glad this year is coming to a close, as 2009 will go down in history as a year of scandals, disgraces, and re-evaluations. This will be, for some, the year we never thought would end. AP writer Jeffrey Collins believed this concept so strongly that he subtitled a Christmas Eve article, “2009 is the Year of the Bad Decision in SC.”

He cited 4 amazingly bad decisions in the state. First, Marc Torchi decided to spruce up the neighborhood by burning some debris in his yard, which led to the most costly wildfire in South Carolina history. Next, Olympic swimmer Michael Phelps went to Columbia, SC - just to hang out - and some of his “friends” photographed him smoking from a sixties-styled marijuana pipe. Third, Congressman Joe Wilson got so upset about President Obama’s healthcare plan and his delivery of a message before Congress that he shouted out the phrase, “You, lie!” Finally, the article alluded to Governor Mark Sanford’s mysterious disappearance so that he could be with his “soul mate.” The rendezvous led to disgrace and divorce in the governor’s mansion.

Jeffrey Collins went on and on in his half-social commentary, half-rant style to explain the epic proportions of the South Carolina’s year-long “judgment gate.” To summarize his sentiments he wrote, “It seemed that with every click on a news Website in 2009, someone in South Carolina was making a choice that left the rest of the nation shaking its collective head.” For this chagrinned writer, John Stewart’s parody of the state entitled “Thank You South Carolina” aired in August on the Daily Show was the height of ignominy and shame.

Unfortunately for the rest of us, South Carolina is not the only place where bad decisions were made in 2009. The rest of the nation had its own unique “faux pas” or own “judgment gates.” I use the word “gate” to pick up on the concept that in the Nixon era the “Watergate” scandal became a national embarrassment. This past year was so filled with gaffs that I could list 12 or 15 major national or political “watergate” moments. Let me remind you of just a few.

What about the “Acorn-gate” scandal? This debacle was caused by “home movies” depicting a young couple discussing their prostitution earnings with the wise counselors of Acorn. Next there was the “Cambridge-gate,” a controversy that highlighted the continued depths of our race problems in the US. You will recall how Harvard professor Skip Gates and the Cambridge cop (a police trainer on the ills of racial profiling) got locked in an incendiary, name-calling match that burned so brightly that it could only be put out at the White House with the president over a beer.

We cannot leave the media world out. Let’s remember the “Late-show-gate.” David Letterman’s secret dalliances led to a black mailing charge of a media tycoon, a national on air confession, and the smearing of numerous reputations. The whole explosion seemed surrealistic coming from the man that attempted to belittle Sarah Palin, her family’s values, and her daughters for their youthful indiscretions.

It is hard to select the next hall of fame winner for bad 2009 decisions. Some believe that Charles Berkley’s sexually charged statements after a DUI are legendary. While millions feel that Tiger Woods’ extra marital affairs have broken the Richter scale for earthquake-like scandals.

I will not go on and on about poor judgment. It is sufficient to say that we have a national lapse of culture, character, and decorum. The nation has been most shocked by the clay feet of national heroes and those among the lists of the rich and famous. Unfortunately, indiscretions abound among the last and the least, as well. Alas, poor decisions are a part of the human condition.

This is one of the reasons people make New Years Resolutions. In fact the time of year that we use to formulate these concepts predates Christ by at least 200 years, when January was added to the Roman calendar. The development of the month of January is credited to Numa Pompilius, the second Roman king before it became a republic. Numa named the month after the mythic pagan god who was the lord of beginnings and endings and of gates and doors. Janus was depicted having two faces with one face looking back to what is behind and with one face looking toward what lies ahead. The Romans of Pompilius’ day believed that the month of January gave everyone an opportunity to look both backward and forward at the same time. This kind of reflection seems to be so natural at each year’s end.

When Rome converted to Christianity the calendar and original concept of January was christened and given a Christian “name.” The church led the way in establishing new spiritual rituals to celebrate the New Year. Current traditions include Christians prayerfully reflecting on repentance, reformation, and rethinking old problems before celebrating the New Year. Even our secular society has caught the idea of change and reconsideration at this time of year. The net result is that 40-45% of American adults make one or more resolutions each year.

Among the top New Year’s resolutions are always ones about weight loss, exercise, and breaking bad habits. Researchers say that included in the most popular resolutions are issues like dealing better with money management/debt reduction. Unfortunately 25% of us abandon our resolutions after the first week. At the end of the first month nearly 35% have changed their minds, while nearly 55% give up on their goals after 6 months. Despite this attrition rate the reality is that those who make New Year’s resolutions are 10 times more likely to keep their commitments than those who make no plans or resolutions at all.

So this year reflect! Celebrate the good things and then make a New Year’s resolution for personal development. It may just change your world!

Foolish Congressional Accounting Made Simple

By Armstrong Williams

A good friend of mine came up to me the other day and said, “Hey, I’ll be a millionaire in ten years.”

Now, I know this guy isn’t a millionaire. He can’t possibly make more than $100,000 a year, and I know he has a big home he’s paying off and a few kids in school.  So I said, “Really? Do you have a rich uncle who’s dying soon?”

He replied, “Nope.  My friend, I’ll be a millionaire if you don’t count any of my expenses. Yeah, if you take out what I owe on my house, my car payments, health expenses, taxes, I’ll be a bona fide millionaire in ten years. It’s called ‘congressional accounting,’ man, it’s the new way of doing math.’”

Of course, this little exchange didn’t really happen, as I don’t know anyone who does their expenses that way, except for the senators and congressmen I’ve met when it’s our money they’re playing with.

But that’s exactly how Congress gets to its “cost savings” on this monstrous, trillion-dollar health care bill. It’s how Congress claims they’re going to make us all millionaires like my imaginary friend, when in fact they’re handing us the most expensive entitlement in in our nation’s history.

It’s easy to “save money” over 10 years, as the bill’s proponents deceitfully claim, if you’re fudging the numbers.  See, Congress is going to collect revenues (taxes, fees) for four years to save up for the benefits that don’t fully kick in until 2014.

What a terrible bargain.  I don’t know anyone who would start making car payments today for a car they can’t drive off the lot till 2014, but that’s basically what Congress is doing with this health-care reform. “Pay now,” they say “We’ll start giving what you’re paying for later…in four years.”

That’s it!  This was the issue so urgent it needed to pass before Christmas?

If we all made budgets the way Congress did, no one would have any debt-we’d all be liquid with cash and wouldn’t have a care in the world.  (Hell, if we did accounting the way Congress did, there would have been no need  for this reform because everyone could afford health care!) But here in the real world, it doesn’t work that way. And, what Congress isn’t telling you is that in their world, it doesn’t work that way either.  At some point, we’re all going to pay, because accounting gimmicks may work to get this health legislation passed quickly in the middle of the night, but someday we’ll all get stuck with the bill.

The United States Senate is marching towards history, but not the kind they will welcome once the dust settles from the fallout of the health care reform debate.  There are so many political favors buried in this bill that reporters simply don’t have the time to uncover them all, or quite possibly they are just in bed with healthcare pushing Democrats.

And yet, the American people see this albatross for what it truly is - a massive expansion of government.  Why do both parties fixate on and equate more power centralized in this modern-day Sodom as a public good?  And, are we voters so naïve or numb to this fact that when we remain silent, politicians see that as acquiescent approval?

I am utterly amazed at the sentimentality Democrats and President Obama are expressing in the final hours before America’s financial Armageddon:  Proponents invoking Ted Kennedy as if his ghost meandered those halls late at night with only the Democratic caucus.  Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) early Tuesday morning pensively stating the Senate will be forever remembered for such heroic acts by the Democrats.  Even Obama proudly defied anyone to point out differences between his campaign promises on health reform and what will ultimately pass - a nod to his omniscience, some suspect.

Poor President Barrack.  He just doesn’t get it.  He piously declares he has “excellent coverage” as president.  He doesn’t need reform.  He’s fighting for those who don’t have coverage.  Yet in every interview and public appearance, the benefits of this measure are conveniently excluded or glossed over with tough talk of nailing “fat cat” insurance companies.  Instead, the president parrots a familiar line every Democrat in Washington is asserting, “We’re making history!”  To him, passage of this bill is more about securing a “W” in his column, not moving sound public policy.  Don’t believe me?  Then if it were so important and so monumental, why move a bill in as little time as it takes Congress to name a post office?  Why not wait for Congress’s budget office to say how much it will cost?  And why for heaven’s sake do you enact a bill that begins to tax Americans immediately to pay for it, yet doesn’t offer them the first dime in benefits for several years?  Is that courageous?  Is that historic?

Not to mention the sweetheart deals that are packed into this monstrous bill that will undoubtedly develop into having a mind of their own. The Louisiana Purchase is one of the sweeter deals of the sweethearts.

Senator Mary L. Landrieu of Louisiana, like many politicians, sold her vote on this bill for $300 million in the form of dollars matched by the federal government for Medicaid services -which is paid for, in part, out of state coffers; hence, the need for sweetheart deals.

Unfortunately still, such shadiness has the potential to completely tank this bill.

For the state of Nebraska, things get even sweeter. Senator Bill Nelson was able to talk our federal government into paying 100% of their Medicaid bill indefinitely. What is going to happen when other statesbegin to sue based on the equal protection clause? They won’t be getting nearly the same amount of money as the government.

Landrieu and Nelson just sold out the American people. When will America rise up and realize that this bill isn’t for the people?

Meanwhile, back in reality, rank-and-file Democrats are headed for the exits.  In the past few weeks, a handful of old bull Democrats announced their retirements, not willing to face the voters in 2010 for their gluttonous giving-in to Pelosi’s at-all-costs leftist agenda.

Others are simply trading in their jerseys for the other team, another sign Pelosi as speaker is the wrong way to go. Rep. Parker Griffith out of Alabama announced his switch just yesterday; is he the only Democrat listening to his constituents?

The Christmas of 2009 is rapidly shaping up as a Black Friday for Democrats.  They confidently stride into the chamber, determined they are headed toward Destiny’s banquet table, yet the voters know otherwise; they are foolishly striding toward defeat.

www.armstrongwilliams.com

Williams can be heard nightly on Sirius/XM Power 169  9pm - 10 pm est

and 5:00am - 6:00 am est.

We really can have a better America in 2010

By Herman Cain

It is hard to imagine that we can have a better America in 2010 with all the things that got worse in 2009. The economy got worse. The unemployment rate got much worse. The war in Afghanistan got worse. The national debt got much worse. The annual deficit got worse. The general attitude of the American people got worse. The favorability of Congress got much worse. And the president’s favorability ratings got much worse.

But we can have a better 2010 than 2009, and here’s how.

First, remember the words of the Declaration of Independence:

“When any form of government becomes destructive of these ends (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness) it is the right of the people to alter or abolish them.”

We have some altering and abolishing to do to make 2010 better that 2009.

It concludes at the ballot box in November 2010. It starts with people getting informed, engaged, involved and energized about the issues, the solutions, the deceptions and the lies about what is being forced onto the American people.

I know this is the “season for the reason” for being thankful, and we are. But we have to do some things differently in 2010 to keep this country as the greatest country in the world.

Thomas Jefferson said, “The American people won’t make a mistake, if they are given all of the facts.” President Ronald Reagan also reminded us of that truth.

That’s what the tea party rallies, conferences and demonstration bus tours are all about. That’s what the public anger and outrage is all about, even though the president and the Democratic leadership are ignoring it. People are learning the facts and the truth.

This time the people will remember in November.

Long-time politicians are used to voters having short memories or no memories at all about broken promises, or selling their legislative votes for pork project favors. But voters no longer have to depend on the bias of the broadcast media for their information. The explosion of Internet information has produced the narrowcast media (coined by Dr. Frank Luntz in his book “Words that Work”), which voters are using more and more to learn and remember the truth.

They will remember that the Cap & Trade & Tax & Kill bill was passed in 2009 without any members of Congress actually reading the legislation. People will remember that the Health Care Deform legislation passed in both houses of Congress was a blatant attempt to confiscate and, ultimately, control our lives from cradle to grave.

People will remember that they do not have a job. Businesses will remember that they cannot grow their businesses and hire new employees because government has raised taxes instead of lowering taxes.

Secondly, no matter how much we think we are already involved in making our opinions known to members of Congress and the president, we must all crank it up a notch, to borrow a phrase from the famous chef, Emeril Lagasse.

Some of us need to run for office. Some of us need to join an organization that represents our views and opinions about the direction of the country. Some of us need to just simply wake up and pay attention to what’s really happening.

Lastly, America is not going down without a fight, and we are not going down. We never have, and we never will. The president and Congress want us to believe that the worst legislations of the century are a done deal. They are not.

In the world of opera, it is said that it’s not over until the fat lady sings. The fat lady will be singing for the voters in November 2010.

Statement of Project 21’s Deneen Borelli on ACORN Report




For Release: December 23, 2009
Contact: David Almasi at (202) 543-4110 x11 or e-mail project21@nationalcenter.org

Statement of Project 21 Fellow Deneen Borelli Congressional Research Service ACORN report requested by Rep. John Conyers (D-MI, which absolves ACORN of allegations of misusing taxpayer money received over the past five years:

“Anyone who saw the video of undercover filmmakers being advised by several different ACORN offices on how to break tax laws and set up brothels can figure that taxpayer money is likely being misspent somewhere by this radical group. Representative Conyers’ refusal to conduct an investigation of ACORN, and ignoring the pleas of his colleagues in the process, is appalling.

“Now, it seems as if he is going to try to hide behind a report he commissioned from a research service controlled by the congressional leadership of which he is a member.  This doesn’t pass the smell test.  There are plenty of things suspect about ACORN.  Just watch the video.  Or talk to prosecutors in several cities currently conducting investigations of ACORN-related vote fraud.  Or read about how former a ACORN bookkeeper may have embezzled as much as $5 million from the group.

“Americans are appalled that taxpayers’ funds are supporting the work of ACORN.  The fact that ACORN receives hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal grants is reason enough for a formal Congressional investigation even without the allegations of wrongdoing.

“For Conyers to question the need for a bipartisan oversight hearing on ACORN is akin to his questioning of the need to read the health care bill earlier this year. It raises the question: What exactly are his responsibilities in his mind?  Why are taxpayers paying his salary?”

Project 21, a leading voice of black conservatives since 1992, is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research (http://www.nationalcenter.org).

Don’t Shortchange Your Kids at Christmas




By Mychal Massie

Christmas time is supposed to be a time of good cheer, but what I have to say about it will likely offend some and infuriate others.

More often these days, it’s a time dominated by the concern: “What do I get the kids for Christmas?”  A lot of parents plaintively searching for things they can ill-afford and - in reality - their kids really don’t need.

But, for those unable to differentiate between wasting money, overspending and what a child really needs, the quest is on.

Children really need something substantive, and there is nothing more enduring than a fundamental understanding of what Christmas is about and the reason we celebrate it.

Christmas is about the birth of Christ.  It is about the love of God for mankind.  God sent His only Begotten Son, to be born of a virgin. Through His virgin birth, death and resurrection, we can have eternal life with Him if we confess, believe and accept Him in our hearts.

But too many parents only seem willing to sit with their children to watch imbecilic TV programs than discuss Christmas Truths.  They will take their kids to Wal-Mart and Target before they take them to church.  Some do go to church - but not necessarily to learn of Christ.  To them, it’s a Christmas obligation.

It’s all part of a larger problem of society being divided by educational preparedness. Children must be able to function on par levels to contribute to the continued devolvement of our nation’s intellectual ascendancy.

I’m not against toys and gifts, but I am against ignorance.  If children cannot read, write, speak or interact beyond the immediate environs of their neighborhoods, how will they be able to contribute to our tomorrow?

I was raised by a single mother who suffered an emotional breakdown when I was ten years old. Despite that, she never allowed her condition to excuse me from learning.  I did not go without a toy, but the gifts I received -regardless of how basic - reinforced her belief in educational preparedness.  They also came with the strict expectation that I excel academically.  She and my grandmother set the bar high, and I was expected to respond.

Today, the bar generally seems to be lower.  Children can repeat verbatim the words to dozens of stupid, worthless and - in many instances - vulgar, anti-social, misogynistic “rhymes” masquerading as music, but they have likely never read Charles Dickens or Mark Twain and or heard Bach or Brahms.

My grandmother used to say: “An excuse is the easiest thing in the world to find.” Parents today must stop making excuses for underperforming children.  And to those parents who thump their chests with pride because they have a bumper sticker proclaiming their child’s honor status, they owe it to themselves to check the quality of the schooling.

In my office I have two old family photos - one from the mid/late 1880s, and the other from 1900. One was born a slave, while the two in the other photo were born just after emancipation.  I was told that my relatives in those photos were able to read and write.  For that era, it was a true gift.

Toys break, and the newest electronic and computer games seem obsolete minutes after they are purchased.  A truly valuable gift is a bankbook and savings account for a child to contribute to regularly - and to which there are strict guidelines for withdrawal.  Too few children understand the value of money and the need to save it.

This Christmas, for those who choose not to share the Truth of Christmas, at least give children more than a video game or earrings.  Give them something that, when they are older, they will still have.

Books don’t break, and a penny saved is still a penny earned.

#  #  #

Mychal Massie is the chairman of the black leadership network Project 21.  Comments may be sent to Project21@nationalcenter.org.

Statement of Project 21’s Bob Parks on Senator Whitehouse Comments


For Release: December 21, 2009
Contact: David Almasi at (202) 543-4110 x11 or e-mail project21@nationalcenter.org

This statement was issued today by Bob Parks of the national black leadership network Project 21:

“President Obama’s almost-constant apologies to the world for the our nation’s actions and his socialist economic policies at home have energized a normally lethargic American people into gathering in American cities and storming the steps of the Capitol in protest.  Senator Whitehouse would have us all just shut up and give Obama his political victories unchallenged.  Not doing so makes us all guilty of unprecedented rudeness and - dare I say it - racism.

“Despite liberals’ historically dismal and revisionist civil rights history, when things with this President fall apart, they are all too willing to resort to playing the race card.  The problem is - whether it’s the Black Panthers in Philadelphia or Professor Gates in Cambridge - Barack Obama and his administration have conducted themselves so poorly in office that the race label really doesn’t bruise the skin anymore.

“If President Obama had not entered the presidency with his signature arrogance, the American people may have had more patience, but he and his liberal allies have talked down to the American people like we were stepchildren they were forced to tolerate.  Statements like those of Senator Whitehouse only further harden the opposition’s resolve.”

During Senate debate on the Obamacare bill on December 20, Senator Whitehouse said: “They are desperate to break this president.  They have ardent supporters who are nearly hysterical at the very election of President Barack Obama.  The birthers, the fanatics, the people running around in right-wing militia and Aryan support groups, it is unbearable to them that President Barack Obama should exist.  That is one powerful reason.  It is not the only one.”

Project 21, a leading voice of black conservatives since 1992, is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research (http://www.nationalcenter.org).

Hey taxpayers, enjoy these Christmas lumps of coal from Congress

By Herman Cain

As members of Congress headed out of town for the Christmas recess, they left behind some gifts for the taxpayers: The House passed $155 billion jobs bill, a $1.1 trillion fiscal 2010 spending bill to fund operations of the federal government, and Senator Ben Nelson’s deciding 60th vote on the Senate’s health care bill.

A few observations about each gift might lessen your appetite for Christmas dinner, but it’s worth knowing the truth and avoiding a few calories as a bonus.

Since the $787 billion so-called stimulus bill spent on roads, bridges and “shovel ready” projects produced monthly 2009 unemployment rates ranging from 8.1 percent to 10.2 percent, and a reported 480,000 new jobless claims last week, it is safe to conclude that we cannot spend our way to prosperity.

Congress and the Obama Administration believe that we can, and that an additional $155 billion bill will be the economic surge we need.

That’s highly unlikely since they are spending the additional money on the same type of projects and government jobs for which the $787 billion was spent. Merry Christmas, taxpayers. We get some more ineffective spending of our money.

The $1.1 trillion for fiscal year 2010 (October 1, 2009 – September 30, 2010) is a 10 percent increase over fiscal 2009 to fund operations of the federal government. The annual federal budget has increased every year in this decade, and this is the highest of the decade. When most people are just happy to have a job without a raise because of the recession, Uncle Sam gives itself a double-digit increase. Merry Christmas!

Let’s not forget the increase in the national debt limit that Congress had to approve in order to accommodate the 2010 fiscal year increase, and to make its spending binge look legal for another red ink Christmas using our credit card.

And, as if the spending was not sickening enough, Senator Ben Nelson (D-Nebraska) has sold his 60th deciding vote for the Senate’s health care bill. According to Patty Murray, writing for Politics Daily, Sen. Nelson got some changes to the abortion funding language, and a “favored state” Medicaid reimbursement rate for the state of Nebraska. Specifically, as Murray reports:

The new bill has the federal government permanently paying 100 percent of the cost to expand Medicaid in Nebraska, while other states will pay 2.2 percent of the price to expand the program to millions of uninsured Americans.

Of course, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid sees nothing wrong with sweetheart deals for Nebraska, Connecticut, Vermont, Louisiana and other states in order to pass a health care bill the majority of Americans opposed. He calls it compromise.

I call it corruption and treason. The Constitution was never intended to be distorted to take from some states to give to other states. Nor was the intent to take from nearly half of the taxpayers and give to the other half.

Here are some other gifts the Senate gave us in their version of the health care bill:

  • A mandate that all individuals purchase health insurance by 2014
  • Penalties for employers who do not offer insurance to their employees
  • Medicare payroll tax increase of 0.9 percent on income over $250,000 annually
  • A 21 percent cut in Medicare reimbursement rates for doctors starting in 2010
  • A 40 percent “Cadillac” tax on high-dollar insurance plans starting in 2013
  • Mandates on insurance companies, which means higher costs

The bill will have to survive a final floor vote in the Senate, and then be reconciled with the House version, which has already passed. Using taxpayer money to buy votes for final passage, anything can happen.

But there is one certainty. Combining two bad health care bills equals one bad health care bill. Senator Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) described it as “a legislative train wreck of historic proportions”.

That’s quite a gift to our grandchildren, who would certainly suffer the most.

Same-Sex Marriage Bill Signed in a Church

By Harry R. Jackson, Jr.

Last Friday, two historic events occurred. A signing ceremony for DC’s same-sex marriage law and a blizzard that blanketed the Northeast and left everyone in the capital physically isolated except for the almost-too-frequent weather updates on TV and Radio. Ironically, the two events bore a strange similarity.

Their similarity was the level of local media coverage along with the real sense of isolation that most citizens felt. We either trust in both these situations that “big brother” is looking out for us or we become concerned and questioning.

Concerning the snowstorm, my one-year-old, 4-wheel drive proved to be a great investment. I was at the mercy of no one. Owning a vehicle like this left me feeling in control and safe despite the 15 plus inches that fell around my apartment. Concerning the city council decision, thousands of people like myself felt that they were simply at the mercy of the city government. Although I had no immediate vehicle to ride like the one I referenced concerning the snowstorm, the feeling of helplessness was only temporary. I reminded myself that even though DC sometimes runs like a banana republic or third world jurisdiction, the democratic process has built in checks and balances available for the people.

After the signing ceremony, several television stations asked me the obvious questions: How did you feel? What are your next steps? The first question was easy to answer. I felt that the people of the District had been disenfranchised and that the biggest real losers in this political drama could possibly be the children of the next generation. I was not upset or angry, but I was definitely disappointed in the leadership of the city. Intellectually, I was not surprised. Emotionally, I was appalled at the cynical staging of the signing. It was more like a PR stunt. Holding the signing in a church when the council, with the exception of Marion Barry and Yvette Alexander, had ignored the voices of both prominent African-American churches and the powerful Roman Catholic Archdiocese seemed disingenuous at best.

During his campaign the mayor visited the Missionary Baptist Conference of the DC and Vicinity, where he told them that he did not have a pastor or attend church on any regular basis. So why did this mayor feel compelled to grace the doors of a church? Was it just political grandstanding? Most people think so. They feel that this move had been scripted by gay marriage activists who still are not sure whether the measure will be overturned by Congress or a referendum.

I could not help but think of the hypocrisy of the city council that had the audacity to call their new law, DC Marriage Equality and Religious Liberty. This terminology has become the typical way such laws are introduced around the country. The proponents of same-sex marriage laws attempt to minimize

The proposed law gives anything but religious liberty. For Bible-believing congregations, the law undermines the very foundational concept of marriage. In fact thousands of people around the city found the gesture and symbolism of using a church as being the ultimate insult. It is obvious to anyone who has just cursorily looked at it. Naturally, the lawmakers cite 200 hundred clergy (many from the same churches) as a sign that there is some kind of major debate over marriage in Christian circles. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The words of Pastors Dennis and Christine Wiley of Covenant Baptist Church printed in the Sunday Washington Post tell the true story of religious freedom and same-sex marriage in DC. “Our church is the first and only traditional black church in the District of Columbia to perform same-sex unions. We conducted our first two union ceremonies, one gay and one lesbian, in the summer of 2007. The rapid political developments that followed in our nation and our city have made us optimistic that by the summer of 2010, same-sex nuptials will be not only blessed by churches such as ours, but also sanctioned by law in the District.”

In the folklore of our city, especially the church community, they remember the days that Bishop McCollough of the United House of Prayer had enough clout to come out of his prayer closet and give a midnight endorsement that changed the direction of a city-wide election - placing David Clarke into council chairmanship. Others remember that the city council wanted to move the Bible Way Church from their prominent New York Avenue location by invoking imminent domain. After Bible Way Church, who were also the local organizers of Martin Luther King, Jr’s 1963 March on Washington, fasted and prayed, the city suddenly repented of its actions and decided to create what is now known as the Bible Way bend that takes commuters onto I-395.

The lesson the church must take from the boldness of the city council is that we must be prayerful activists. In a democracy, both are needed.

What’s next?

Dean is right: ‘Kill the bill’

By Star Parker

When, earlier this year, the new Obama administration set health-care reform into motion, word was that they carefully studied the tactical failures of Hillarycare, with resolution to avoid the same mistakes.

Ironically, but not surprisingly, they have repeated them all.

That’s not to say that the door has shut on Obamacare. Something still may pass. But the victory will be pyrrhic. The bills stink. Polling uniformly shows the public, for good reason, doesn’t want them. And Democrats will pay a political price if they force their irresponsible concoction on the nation.

What was supposedly the clever insight of the Obama team was to let Congress take ownership of health-care reform. Rather than piecing it together behind closed doors in the White House, as did Hillary Clinton, let the folks who will have to pass it put their necks on the line.

But the elementary point overlooked was that it doesn’t matter behind whose closed doors politicians hijack one-sixth of the American economy. I’m not going to do any better designing a space shuttle whether I do it in my kitchen or in my den. It’s not my job, and I don’t know how to do it.

Yet, with a special brand of hubris, seasoned with a perverse sense of what making history means, a handful of Democrat powerbrokers have spent a good part of this year designing how hundreds of millions of Americans will, one by one, spend a few trillion dollars annually on health care. And they’ve done this with practically no genuine public debate and discussion.

So how could the product not be garbage?

Even as I write, as Sen. Reid tries to put together 60 votes for passage of his bill, most senators have no idea what’s in it.

Times are so strange that I find myself actually agreeing with former DNC Chairman Howard Dean, who has urged that the Senate bill be killed. Dean writes in the Washington Post, “… as it stands, this bill would do more harm than good to the future of America.”

He correctly identifies one key reason why the legislation is a dismal failure. It does nothing to increase competition in insurance markets.

But, like his liberal friends, Dean’s strange idea of competition is creating a government plan to compete with private insurance companies. This makes as much sense as taxpayers creating a new government car company to make GM more efficient.

More competition among health insurers is critical. It’s competition that drives down prices and creates new efficiencies.

But the way to do this is by deregulating this highly regulated market. Break down state regulatory fiefdoms that prohibit residents from buying from out-of-state companies.

And get government out of the business of defining what insurance is. It only causes insurance to reflect what insurance lobbyists want rather than consumers.

The health-care reform bills we have now do exactly the opposite. All existing regulations are left in place, and vast, sweeping new ones are layered on top of them.

Now, in a wave of particular brilliance, our legislators have created a mandate to force every consumer to buy the government-defined products from these barely competitive insurance companies. The inevitable result will be to hurt consumers even more and subsidize the insurance companies.

The stock market tells the story. Since the health-care reform process began with the White House summit on March 5, the overall stock markert has risen an impressive 54 percent. However, stocks of major health insurers have soared more. CIGNA, up 157 percent. UnitedHealth Group, up 88 percent. Wellpoint, up 84 percent. Aetna, up 65 percent.

It’s time to stop this charade and begin a new, open process aimed to reforming health care that will actually serve American consumers.

Climate Change: The Bell Tolls For Thee

By Harry R. Jackson, Jr.

Last week, the worldwide summit on climate change in Denmark encouraged some and terrified others. During the past few years, the debate among many informed people has just not been about whether the globe is getting warmer or not, but about how our nation should respond to the “perceived” international threat.

A few years ago Tony Perkins, president of The Family Research Council, and I decided to tackle the question of climate change and evaluate popular proposals based on two things: 1.) a measurable return on investment and 2.) the value of human life. Our thoughts are catalogued in the book Personal Faith, Public Policy. Based on our study, we are very concerned about the direction that our current administration may be seduced into following in the name of saving the planet. Unfortunately for the US, there are always wolves dressed in sheep’s clothing — supposed “saviors” that may lead us astray.

What was most alarming to Perkins and I was the resurgence of the call for population control as part of the international prescription to prevent global warming. We are concerned that human life will be devalued in order to “protect the ecosystem.” As believers, all of us must make sure that “population control” is not chosen as a major way of balancing out the CO2 equation. Population control is a loaded term that includes not only abortion, contraception, and sterilization, but infanticide and in some cases the promotion of same-sex relations. In an almost Orwellian manner, women from China have testified before the US Congress of forced abortions, as late as nine months into the pregnancy. “Big brother” in China also forced sterilizations because of the nation’s population control measures.

Last Friday, Laura Ingraham confirmed my concerns that we in the west could fall prey to wrong-headed solutions to population control. She bravely tackled this issue on the O’Reilly Factor by interviewing a self-proclaimed Canadian feminist who extolled the virtues of the Chinese “one child” policy. When asked how such a policy would be carried out, her guest feigned ignorance while insisting that bringing a child into a poverty-stricken environment was somehow immoral.

The present call for population control by secular environmental activists is not unlike the warnings sounded by Thomas Malthus in 1798, who said the world’s growing population was growing exponentially while the earth’s food supply could at best be increased only arithmetically. According to Malthus, the population would soon overtax the planet’s ability to sustain the human race. He argued for policies that would result in a decreased population among the poor classes. He warned that if both private and public policies to limit population were not enacted and wars did not decrease the population, disease and famine would. He obviously underestimated the creativity of the generations that followed him. The innovative power of those generations fueled the Industrial Revolution and increased the average agricultural yield per acre.

Similar to Malthus, Stanford University professor Paul R. Ehrlich, sounded an alarm about population control in 1968. His book, The Population Bomb, predicted millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s and 1980s without population control. The hysteria created by Ehrlich paved the way for the United Nation’s Population Fund, which was established in 1969. Ehrlich believed that those nations who refused to institute his population controls were willing to let citizens of those nations starve to death. He also believed that Indian men who had more than three children should be sterilized by force. Global population control became a major focus of the United Nations as they projected the planet to be overrun with 11.5 billion people. Fortunately for us, Ehrlich was not a prophet. Virtually nothing he wrote came to pass. The UN now admits that the human race, which stands at 6.6 billion people, will fall far short of their projections and peak at 8.5 billion. Demographers currently say that once the population peaks, it will start a long-term decline because of falling birth rates.

Even though the fertility rate is declining across the board in Western nations, it is the most Christian nations that have the highest birth rates. Declining population may eventually become a problem in the west because we have seen children as the consumers of limited resources - rather than a reward and heritage from Lord.

While some well-meaning Christians organized a public a demonstration of solidarity with the Denmark Climate Change summit, we must all beware that we don’t miss the forest for the trees. This past Sunday David Hallman of the World Council of Churches recruited churches in Copenhagen to ring their church bells 350 times in recognition of the 350 parts per million of carbon in the atmosphere goals set by popular climatologists. Undoubtedly, these activists see the devastating ecological impacts of climate change as a death sentence on many of the world’s poorest and most marginalized peoples. Unfortunately, though, they have not thought that we could use the considerable financial and scientific resources of more developed countries to help poorer nations industrialize and strategically assist their poorer citizens in moving from disaster prone regions to places of safety, obtaining better jobs and more productive lives.

We don’t need to hear any more bells of affirmation, we need to sound a meaningful alarm that says, “Human life is still important on this planet and that we will carefully, ethically, and strategically steward the earth!”