The Bears Still Run Wall Street

By Armstrong Williams

Has anyone checked the Dow lately? I realize that consulting the Dow is the worst piece of advice a broker or financial planner would give to clients these days. When times are tough and the economy is on the mend, most analysts will tell you to take a vacation away from your stock portfolio until you have a good reason to look at it again.

But the NYSE closed recently once again under 10,000. In fact, it’s hovering around 9,700 and trending in the wrong direction. I had to chuckle last week when the Dow tipped up a few percentage points on news Congress had passed a sweeping financial services overhaul. Many in the media said that was because financial institutions such as banks would now have some sense of direction as to how their industry would be regulated. Yet like many policies of this administration, the security and sense of direction lasted about as long as a teen-induced sugar high.

The market is trying to tell us something folks! This economy is headed in the wrong direction. And no matter how hard he tries, Obama can no longer lay this at the doorstep of his predecessor. I know every morning the Administration has some intern who scours the papers just for the current mess du jour - more governing by victimization.

If such moves were part of a larger correction that many analysts say was needed, then I would be less apt to point a finger at the White House. But such market fixes should have taken place months ago. What we have here today is more tinkering by the federal fiat. If anyone outside Washington actually believed Congress’s steps through “overhaul” last week would yield any positive benefits, then forecasts for Q3 and Q4 of this year would be far better. And still, they are not.

However, Americans aren’t fooled; the real victims of this economic mess are the unemployed. Although unemployment figures hover around 10 percent, which has been seen as a sign of hope for those who are desperate to find one, unemployment benefits saw a recent increase. This indicates that companies are still laying off people, and those people are now becoming a burden to their government. Such contradicting information can sometimes be confusing in an already complicated market. We can’t just look at one indicator to determine the growth or decline of unemployment.

It has been noted that the US labor market has decreased by 652,000 jobs since May. This much may be due to corporate fears that the economic recovery doesn’t look so rosy. Not only are corporations, and the rest of the private sector, saving their money by not hiring, but they aren’t expending it in the market through other job creating means as well. Unfortunately, this trend is being seen around the world –especially in European countries.

Fueling private industry behavior is a crippled global economy –which President Obama has yet to really attack. But, if our President can’t handle things on the home front, how is he going to navigate our nation through the proverbial economic deep waters that wait abroad? By now it is clear, mainly through a decline in growth in China that global demand for manufactured goods is slowing down.

With both the global and domestic economy slowing down, Americans continue to be baffled by the Obama Administration’s lack of business savvy. There appears to be no effort to reduce spending while increasing revenues insight. The Congressional Budget Office recently warned that the US is on its way towards unsustainable levels of debt. In addition, some of the nation’s biggest expenses, including Social Security and healthcare entitlement programs, will see an increase in spending even with the healthcare reform legislation passing.

To be more specific, our private sector (the true job creators) is still reeling. It’s struggling under the crushing weight of impending fixed costs such as health care, higher wage pressures, more reporting requirements and fewer incentives for innovation. Even with the dollar rising against foreign currencies, such as the Euro, and China’s modest actions last month, the bears still run Wall Street.

It was just the other week, at the G20 meeting in Toronto that the world economic leaders displayed their concern for the direction of American economic fiscal policy. Many are worried that a revamping of fiscal policy would dampen growth and demand in a global marketplace. The concern is that with a struggling demand, there is the possibility that the global economy might be headed for another recession.

As usual, Present Obama supported the idea of stimulating economic growth while correcting deficits at a more opportunistic time. I believe the American people have seen this before. Yet, we have not really seen how the stimulus works. We have heard of one, one intended on creating some 3 million jobs. However, we are still living with the detriments of a stagnant job market which is showing little signs of hope and a lot of talk about a double dipping recession. Well, we have lived through it once with a stimulus; why, if we were headed back, would we want the same fiscal policy to be used again? All Americans have to show for their record breaking stimulus packages is a world of debt and little to nothing to show for it.

As I’ve said before in this column, an economist I am not. But I do know that one of the single largest indicators of the economic health of this nation is hemorrhaging. The Dow, and our nation’s critical private sector, needs help. The longer the White House views the private sector as some harem of fat cat capitalists, the more our workers will be out of long-term jobs.

Up Holder-ing Justice


By Harry R. Jackson, Jr.

When I first discovered that the Justice Department did not criminally prosecute Black Panther Party members for voter intimidation at the polls, I was appalled. It was even more fascinating to hear J. Christian Adams’ (ex - Justice Department official) testimony before the US Commission on Civil Rights last Tuesday. He declared very clearly that “over and over again” the department had shown “hostility” toward cases that involved black defendants and white victims, favoring the defendants. He went on to say, “We abetted wrongdoing and abandoned law-abiding citizens.”  In other words, Adams was blowing the whistle on a strange kind of reverse racism.

What happened to Attorney General Eric Holder’s statements that he was going to pursue civil rights? Didn’t Holder call us a “nation of cowards” for failing to protect the rights of all Americans? In light of the Justice Department’s recent actions, Holder’s words ring hollow and partisan. His team seems to be applying the rule of law selectively according to his ideology, instead of objectively. This is not the dream that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. espoused. He did not want to change positions with whites - allowing blacks to become oppressors in selected jurisdictions. Instead King argued that all the rights and privileges of the constitution should apply to all Americans - regardless of color or creed.

As these thoughts were whirring through my mind, another sign of the Justice Department’s imbalance occurred. On Tuesday July 6, Robert Gibbs made a startling confession. He could not explain why the Justice Department would bring a lawsuit against the State of Arizona (claiming that their most recent immigration laws attempt to supplant current federal law), while allowing the self-proclaimed “Sanctuary Cities” to function without challenge. He told the reporter who asked the question, “I’ll have to get back to you.”

As you may remember, the Sanctuary City term refers to municipalities that refuse to use municipal funds or resources to enforce federal immigration laws. Typically they forbid municipal employees or police to inquire about one’s immigration status. Therefore, undocumented aliens are free to maintain their lives without fear of arrest despite their violation of federal laws. Just like the Black Panther case, in the name of creating justice, good laws being are ignored.

Let’s circle back to the details of the New Black Panther case and its history for a moment. The Justice Department abandoned the New Black Panther Party case last year, after winning a default judgment in federal court in April due to Black Panther members’ failure to appear. The charges against the Panthers stemmed from an incident on Election Day in 2008 in Philadelphia. Party members were videotaped in front of a polling place, while dressed in military-style uniforms and allegedly hurling racial slurs at voters. One of them even went so far as to carry a nightstick. The Holder Justice Department moved to dismiss the charges the following month after getting one of the New Black Panther members to agree not carry a “deadly weapon” anywhere near a polling place until 2012.

This group has a history of aggression. During the late 1960s, this group was involved in a series of violent confrontations with the police and numerous court cases. One of the most famous trials was that of Huey Newton for killing a policeman in 1967. In addition, Bobby Seale, one of the “Chicago Eight” was charged and convicted of conspiracy to violently disrupt the Democratic National Convention of 1968 (conviction later overturned).

The Black Panther ideology of hate is at the very roots of the organization. For example, two of its leaders, Khalid Abdul Muhammad, who led the Black Panthers from 1993-2001, and Malik Zulu Shabazz, his successor, have made numerous anti-Semitic statements. They have spoken hatefully, laying the issues of the Holocaust, slavery, and even September 11th events at the Jews’ feet. The Party holds to a conspiracy theory that states that 4000 Jews called in “sick” that day as they had advance knowledge of the attacks.

In 2007, New Black Panther Party leader, Shabazz, was interviewed on the O’Reilly Factor program by Michelle Malkin. In the wake of the Duke University Lacrosse bogus rape case, Shabazz had protested at the university and during multiple interviews, demanding that the three players be convicted. In his interview with Malkin, Shabazz showed his dissatisfaction with the outcome of the trial. He stated that the players were exonerated because of pressure applied by the rich white community. He refused to apologize for his incendiary statements made during the trial. He went on to accuse Malkin of becoming a “political prostitute for a racist like Bill O’Reilly.”

What does the original Black Panther Party think about the New Black Panthers? Several members of the original group as well as members of the Huey P. Newton Foundation (named after the co-founder of the original party) have registered their repugnance of the new movement. The Newton Foundation released a statement, which denounced the new party, stating that the new group took on the name of “Black Panthers” when they had failed “to find its own legitimacy in the black community.”

If the original members are denouncing the New Black Panther Party, why should the Justice Department give them acknowledgement and even, favor? Eric Holder needs to uphold the justice he has sworn to maintain. This justice is in the best interests for all the people - both black and white. So, let freedom ring from Philadelphia to Phoenix, from our Canadian borders to our Mexican borders, from New York to Los Angeles, and everyone in between. So, let freedom ring!

No More Doubting Thomas

By Raynard Jackson
Last week I wrote about the need for Blacks to become more politically sophisticated.  Blacks are way too emotional about things they can’t control.  We tend to get emotional after the fact, when nothing can be done to change a situation.  In politics, it’s far easier to stop something from happing than to modify something after it has happened.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is a case in point.  When former president Bush nominated Thomas in 1991, radical liberal Black folks went crazy.  Groups like the NAACP and Congressional Black Caucus called him everything other than a child of God.

What was Thomas’ sin?  He dared to think differently than those chosen by the white, liberal media claiming to represent Black folks.  It was said that Thomas was not “fit” to replace Justice Thurgood Marshall.

Who could have ever replaced Michael Jordan, Martin Luther King, or Michael Jackson?  No one!  Justice Marshall was more influential than all three of these people combined.  That’s why it was so idiotic for Republicans to attempt to disparage Marshall’s jurisprudence in their attacks on Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan.  Attacking Marshall, in the Black community, is akin to liberals attacking Ronald Reagan in conservative circles.  Republicans still do not “get it.!”  But, I digress.

There is no such thing as a Marshall seat on the Supreme Court.  He is IRREPLACABLE.  So, as opposed to complaining when a Republican president nominates someone who is not liberal, why do Blacks not do anything when a Democratic president nominates someone who is not “liberal” enough?

Why would a Black liberal expect a Republican president to do something that a Democratic president hasn’t done since former president Lyndon Johnson—put a Black liberal on the Supreme Court?

This is the danger with putting 90 plus percent of your vote in one party.  You end up having no influence in either party.  The Democrats take your vote for granted because they know you will not vote for the other party and Republicans continue to ignore you.

I helped Clarence Thomas with his confirmation to the Supreme Court.  I disagree with most of his court rulings, but he is a very good person—one you definitely want to hang out with on a Friday evening after work.

I don’t understand why people are surprised to find out that I have many good friends who are high level officials within the Obama administration.  Everyone knows that I am Republican, but what does that have to do with us being friends?

Why is it that the Jewish community doesn’t vilify a Jewish member of the Supreme Court when they disagree with a particular decision from that member? Or the Hispanic community? Or Females?

Weak people take strong positions on weak issues.  Thomas has a lifetime appointment to the court, so in the immortal words of former mayor of D.C., Marion Barry, “get over it.”

Blacks complain when Republicans ignore them and they complain when the Democrats ignore them.  But, yet they continue to vote the same way, thereby undercutting their very complaints.  Politically, no one fears the Black vote.  Therefore they are ignored by everyone.

You have both political parties fighting for the Hispanic vote, but not since the 1960s have you seen a fight for the Black vote.  The Hispanic community has one of their own on the Supreme Court and one party with a high-profile fight for amnesty for their community.  What is it that Blacks have to show under the Obama administration?  Please, I challenge all those in the Black community to name something specific to the Black community.

So, if we hold Obama to the Clarence Thomas standard, he should be called an “uncle tom,” a “sellout,” and not a “real Black man.”  Blacks have proven that they can separate the person from their policy (s); so please extend the same courtesy to Justice Clarence Thomas.  Whether you agree with his judicial opinions or philosophies is irrelevant.

He has earned the right to be respected by virtue of his life’s accomplishments.  So, before Black liberals continue to trash Clarence Thomas, they should apply the same standard they use to let liberals off the hook.

Basically, Democrats are saying to the Black community, you are right; we haven’t done enough for the Black community.  Now, go out and make us do something.  Blacks don’t have the guts to take a principled stand to “go out and make them do it.”

While I may disagree with Thomas’ court rulings, I have supreme respect for him.  I have had the opportunity to be around him in private settings and have seen the real him.  He is a great person, NO DOUBT!

Raynard Jackson is president & CEO of Raynard Jackson & Associates, LLC., a D.C.-public relations/government affairs firm.

I return from vacation, and dang, you people are stressed out! But no wonder . . .

By Herman Cain

I did it!

I did not read, watch or listen to any news stories about what is going on in this country for seven days. There were no exceptions! Nada! Nor did I do any of my radio shows.

I took a vacation from the problems of America. I came back relaxed!

When I re-engaged with the news I realized just how stressed out America is with its problems. It was like looking at America’s problems from 50,000 feet and seeing the forest and not just the daily “trees” in the news. Although there was nothing new in the news, seven major stress points appeared to have only gotten worse in seven days.

The Gulf oil tragedy got worse. The first thing that flashed on the news program I watched was “Day 71” and the oil spill was still gushing. The oil was threatening the Louisiana shoreline, and the federal response was still slow and bureaucratic.

The Obama Administration is still in denial about the seriousness of Arizona’s southern border insecurity. Instead of providing serious support for Arizona and other border states, the administration put up some signs near the border warning people of the dangers, and pressed forward with their legal challenge to the new Arizona immigration law.

The war in Afghanistan has a new general in charge, but the outlook for “victory” is still bleak. It will be difficult even for General Petraeus because it is widely recognized that the Afghanistan government is corrupt, and the “rules of engagement” to protect civilians increases the dangers to our troops. The Taliban has only one rule of engagement: Kill!

The American debt crisis continues to get worse with the administration and the Democrat-led Congress still on a spending binge. Our crisis here is made worse by the situation in Europe, which could trigger another worldwide financial meltdown and the USA would not be spared.

A jobless economic recovery is not a recovery. As the administration continues to say the “stimulus” is working, the facts continue to indicate otherwise. Unemployment for June was just reported to be 9.5 percent with June job losses at 125,000, while 650,000 people dropped out of the labor force so they were not counted. Nearly 15 million people are still unemployed.

But President Obama says “we are headed in the right direction.”

The confirmation hearings for Elena Kagan were just Washington political theater. Political analysts believe she will be confirmed and will tip the balance of the Supreme Court to be more liberal-leaning than Constitutional-leaning.

This seventh major stress point was an “ah-ha” scary moment. Although the president’s approval ratings are down, the scariest statistic is the 45 percent of the public who think he’s doing a good job. Who are these people?

This means that all Obama has to do to get re-elected is to swoon six more percentage points of voters with a slick speech or political ad and he wins. That’s scary. It also means that those of us who are not part of the scary-45 percent have our work cut out for us.

The good news is that the numbers are in our favor. Conservatives out-number liberals two-to-one according to an ongoing Gallup poll, and moderates outnumber liberals nearly two-to-one.

We have to work harder at educating, mobilizing and inspiring people to vote the right way in November 2010 and 2012, because America’s problems are not going to take a vacation.

Our Problems Not in the Atmosphere

By Star Parker

A delegation of 20 black mayors representing the National Conference of Black Mayors arrived in Washington, DC to lobby congress to pass legislation to promote “clean energy.”

According to the delegation’s press release, they want “a national plan to move their cities to become more energy efficient, reduce pollution and create new clean energy jobs and businesses.”

But is black unemployment twice the national unemployment rate because of carbon emissions? Are the budgets of state and local governments running in the red because of the kind of energy Americans burn?

One visit that the delegation of black mayors did not make was to the National Black Chamber of Commerce.

There they could have discussed the study done for the NBCC by CRA International that estimates job losses to the American economy from “clean energy” initiatives - cap and trade bills passed by the House and Senate - at about 2.5 million jobs.

And, according to the National Black Chamber, because the nation’s black population is concentrated in areas impacted the most by increased “clean energy” taxes and costs, the negative impact on black jobs will be even more severe.

What other result would we expect from layering several hundred billion dollars in new taxes on our economy, which is what “clean energy” bills that the black mayors want so badly would do? Why would these mayors be spending their time promoting policies so intuitively nonsensical?

Supposedly we have no choice. Three assumptions drive it all: that the earth’s climate has irreversibly warmed (which will cause major problems), that this warming is caused by carbon emissions from burning fossil fuels, and that we’ve got to get government to intervene to get us off these fuels and onto alternatives.

The global warming nightmare is a warm fuzzy dream for those that want even more major government interference in our private lives.

And if the premises behind it were all true, we’d all agree to it.

But these premises are far from clear. The recent “climategate” scandal showed that scientists at global warming “headquarters” at the Climate Research Unit in London were suppressing serious scientific dissent regarding their assumptions and conclusions.

A new article in the prestigious journal of the Phi Beta Kappa society – American Scholar – sheds further serious doubt on “clean energy” initiatives.

The article, by a Nobel Prize winning physicist from Stanford, Robert B. Laughlin, shows that the vast time spans and complexity of the earth’s geological realities are far beyond our understanding and control. Over time, the earth has gone through cycles of cooling and warming.

Dr. Laughlin concludes, “The geological record suggests that climate ought not to concern us too much when we’re gazing into the energy future, not because it is unimportant, but because it’s beyond our power to control.”

The bottom line on “clean energy” initiatives is that the only sure things we will get are more taxes, higher costs, and more government. Guaranteed costs for benefits that are extremely questionable.

Black mayors would be better redirecting their attention from the atmosphere to realities here on earth.

The National Conference on Black Mayors is partnering with the Hip Hop Caucus as “outreach to our nation’s youth.”

Here’s a tangible that black mayors can promote to cut black youth unemployment. Work to get rid of the minimum wage.

Following minimum wage increases of $2.10 since 2007, black youth unemployment increased 50%.

Or how about some serious efforts to promote school choice so that parents of poor kids can send their children to schools where they will get an education and graduate.

Opposing Obama’s Blueprint by Celebrating American Exceptionalism

By Ken Blackwell and Ken Klukowski

On the Fourth of July, we don’t only celebrate the birth of our nation. We celebrate American exceptionalism—everything that makes the United States the greatest nation on earth. In celebrating this, we reject Barack Obama’s blueprint for the kind of country he seeks to make us.

On July 4, 1776, fifty-six dedicated patriots resolved to risk everything in the hope of a new beginning. Elected to represent colonists from across the thirteen British colonies on the American continent, they decided to embark upon a grand experiment, to form a self-governing democratic republic.

They were risking their lives. Had they failed, they would have been hanged as traitors, their lands confiscated by the Crown, their fortuned forfeited, and their families left disgraced and destitute.

Yet they succeeded, and the freest, safest, and prosperous nation in the world was born.

We don’t just celebrate the historical fact of America’s birth. When we celebrate Independence Day, we celebrate everything the United States stands for.

We celebrate the right to speak what we will, no matter how unpopular, without fear of government reprisal. We celebrate our right to worship according to the dictates of our conscience. We celebrate our right to bear arms in defense of ourselves and our freedom. We celebrate our right to be secure in our homes and our families, and should we become entangled with the law, our right not to be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process, which includes everything from our right to a jury trial, to our right to a lawyer, to our right to not incriminate ourselves or be tortured.

While many of us take those rights for granted, the reality is that they are rare, both in history and even around the globe today. But those rights, that liberty, is what we celebrate on the Fourth of July.

In other words, what we celebrate is American exceptionalism.

That’s the belief that America is something special. We are a shining beacon of light throughout the world and throughout the annals of history. We are the exception, not the rule.

The national bestseller The 5000 Year Leap: A Miracle that Changed the World does a masterful job of showing American exceptionalism in the context of world history. With a special focus on economic freedom, this book shows that the principles of liberty enshrined by our Founders in our Declaration of Independence, and later in the U.S. Constitution, led to an inconceivable level of prosperity, safety and happiness in this country that the rest of the world looked at in shocked disbelief.

Yet President Obama doesn’t believe in American exceptionalism. As we quote in our own national bestseller The Blueprint: Obama’s Plan to Subvert the Constitution and Build an Imperial Presidency, Barack Obama is on video, telling a foreign audience in Greece in 2009 that America is only exceptional in the same way that Brits think Great Britain is exceptional, or the Greeks think that Greece is exceptional.

In other words, we’re all exceptional. But since the definition of an exception is something that stands out from the norm, we cannot all be exceptional. If we’re all exceptional, then none of us are exceptional. President Obama could not be more wrong.

He’s busy fundamentally transforming our nation. He’s leading a government takeover of our marvelous free-market economy, including the best healthcare system the world has ever seen. He’s trying to grant citizenship and the right to vote to millions of foreigners who have no interest in becoming Americans, pledging their loyalty to this exceptional nation alone and renouncing all other ties. He’s trying to silence his political critics, and muzzle those few media outlets that tell the truth.

And to top it off, as we saw last week, he’s packing our nation’s courts, and our Supreme Court, with people who see society the same way he does, and will rubber-stamp his agenda as being consistent with the Constitution.

On the Fourth of July, we celebrate our Independence Day—our freedom from oppressive government and our commitment to individual freedom. In doing so, we oppose Barack Obama’s vision, and his blueprint for America.

Happy Fourth of July.

Hey Dmitri, Pass the Ketchup!

By Ken Blackwell

President Barack Obama enjoyed his “hamburger summit” with Russian President Dmitri Medvedev last week. The two men chowed down at Ray’s Hell Burger in the Northern Virginia suburbs of Washington. You can just imagine the president, whom his advisers say has developed a strong relationship with the Russian head-of-state, saying: “Hey Dmitri, pass the ketchup.” Very American.

Dmitri, on the other hand, was involved at that moment in passing something else: American nuclear secrets. The FBI this week announced the arrest of ten suspected Russian spies. These spies were Russians who were given false identities (one had the papers of a dead Canadian).

They were living in American suburbs, apparently pursuing their part of the American dream. Two of the accused spies were living in Arlington, Virginia. Perhaps they were sitting at the next table at Ray’s Hell Burger. Two others, Donald Howard Heathfield and Tracy Lee Ann Foley, lived in a Boston suburb, Cambridge, Massachusetts. That’s the hometown of Prof. Henry Louis Gates, Jr., and James Crowley, last heard from at the president’s famous “beer summit.”

The Hamburger Summit was hailed only last week as evidence of a growing closeness between the U.S. and Russia. President Obama said we still had “differences” with the Russians. Like, maybe, that little matter of the Russians invading the independent nation of Georgia and ripping off a chunk of South Ossetia. Still, this cozy lunch was offered to the media as an example of the Obama administration’s “resetting” of U.S.-Russian relations.

Georgia was not on their minds as the two men chomped their burgers. The FBI, however, seems to have its own ideas about reset buttons. Their counter-espionage pros have been following these Russian spies for years.

Richard Clarke–the famously anti-Bush CIA man–says the Russians are “using cold war techniques and cold war tactics.” The question for this administration might well have been: Have they ever stopped?

Medvedev recently announced the launch of a new Russian nuclear “attack” submarine. You don’t have to be able to speak Russian to see some very interesting things in the online video. First, that red star blazing in the upper right of the TV screen. Hmmm. Where have we seen that before? Wasn’t that red star the symbol of the Soviet Union? Next, listen to that military band. That music is familiar: It’s the Stalin-era Soviet national anthem. Oh, Putin changed the Russian words, but the tune is still there.

I’d like to have been at Ray’s Hell Burger to watch the two leaders. I hope Dmitri Medvedev did not try to grab some of our Commander-in-Chief’s French fries. But in every other way, the United States was being rolled.

President Obama does not reassure us by seeming to pal around with Dmitri Medvedev. First, Medvedev is Vladimir Putin’s agent. Putin has just completed a full decade in undisputed control of Russia. He, not Medvedev, is the Kremlin’s real vozhd–boss.

Second, the Russians have a long history of testing U.S. leaders. When FDR went to Yalta in 1945, all of his words in the dacha in which he was housed were faithfully recorded by Lavrenti Beria, the head of the NKVD, and reported to Stalin. Stalin read the transcripts before each summit session.

In Vienna in 1961–at their only summit–Nikita Khrushchev bullied and threatened our young and inexperienced John F. Kennedy. He later told intimates he had never had never been treated so roughly. Soon, very soon, the Berlin Wall went up and Khrushchev was secretly placing missiles in Cuba. Kennedy’s successful handling of the Cuban missile crisis was possible only because of overwhelming U.S. military strength. President Kennedy had the courage and will to match Khrushchev’s provocative and dangerous move with steely determination.

Two years ago, when much of the media focused on Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s rants, Barack Obama’s cool and detached persona thrilled reporters. “No Drama Obama,” they liked to say, while stressing his formidable intelligence.

Some of us, however, had concerns even then. Don’t just look at Rev. Wright, focus on that congregation. That group was clearly enthused about anti-American pronouncements from the pulpit. That congregation was to Barack Obama what the U.S. Navy was to John McCain: the longest association and the formative institution in his life.

If Obama could sit in that sanctuary for twenty years and not pick up on this basic hostility to our country, is it any wonder that he is surprised at Russian spying? We need a leader with a clear-eyed view of the Russians. We need our president to stop chilling with Medvedev, the monkey, and figure out how to deal with Putin, the organ grinder.

11 Reasons to Vote for Democrats in November

Blacks reclaiming their place in the fight for America

By Carla Harper

Strong and impressive non-white heroes are emerging in America, particularly blacks. They are seeing through what economist Thomas Sowell calls the “poisonous and self-destructive consequences of a steady drumbeat of ideological hype about differences that are translated into “disparities” and “inequities,” provoking envy and resentments under their more prettied-up name of “social justice.” They are breaking out of shackles, in some ways created by revised history that made blacks look like unique victims of white supremacy. Story after story is emerging of strong black figures from the past and today.

There’s a revival underway. We are realizing that division based political tactics that flame an us against them fire, rich against poor, oppressed against oppressor is nothing more than a diversion from the real issues. Many are focusing on the real issues. We care about the national debt, about the oil gushing into the gulf, about reviving private sector jobs not more paper pushing, government jobs, about persevering our relationship with true allies like Israel and Great Britain, and most of all we want to restore the constitutional republic established in 1789.

The rhetoric, sarcasm, and immature governance have worn thin, and the veil has split open. Nancy Pelosi’s fake wide-eyed fear of tea partiers, Bob Etheridge’s creepy grope at a student reporter on the street, Bob Stark’s hubris toward concern for border issues, Charlie Rangel’s failure to pay taxes despite being head of the Ways and Means Committee until recently – these are the attitudes and people that have driven previously non-political people (of all color) out of their homes and businesses and into the public square.

The evidence is all around us as candidates and activists alike are refusing to make race or ethnicity a political calling card. The Frederick Douglass Foundation founded by Dean Nelson, Kenneth B. Morris, Jr. (Great-Great-Great Grandson of Frederick Douglass), Timothy F. Johnson, and Troy Rolling, openly proclaims “We are Devoted Christians - Proud Black Americans - Active Republicans.” The organization is attracting blacks and whites to their message:

Read more…

Silence Can Be So Loud

By Raynard Jackson

What is amazing about the confirmation hearing of Elaine Kagan for the Supreme Court is not the loud rancoring coming out of the Republican Party, but the deafening silence coming from the radical left—especially within the Black and Latino communities.  Their silence speaks so loud.

When will the Black community become more sophisticated in their approach to politics?  If you are on the wrong side of Israel, the Jewish community will withhold their money and vote you out of office.  If you are against amnesty for illegal, the Hispanic community is finally finding the backbone to tell both parties that they will vote against them during elections.  But, when you are on the wrong side of issues of concern to Blacks, they just say, maybe next time!

The National Bar Association (NBA) is a national group for Black lawyers.  They have taken the very unusual step of giving Kagan a rating of “qualified (http://www.nationalbar.org/NBA%20NEWS%20BRIEF-Elena%20Kagan.pdf).”  Why is this unusual?  Usually the NBA is a rubber stamp for Supreme Court nominees from a Democratic president.  A “qualified” rating is a step below its highest rating of “highly qualified.”  When President Obama announced Kagan’s nomination in May, the NBA issued a terse statement saying they “reserved judgment” on the nomination.

So, the question is, what happened between May and now that moved the NBA from a “reserved judgment” to a “qualified” rating?  Absolutely nothing!  Kagan worked in the White House for Clinton and she is very well known within Democratic legal circles.  She did not have a very good relationship with Blacks and was always considered to be “not liberal enough” on issues of race and affirmative action.

Notice some of the comments from within the civil rights community.  Mavis Thompson, president of the NBA told the Washington Post, “Of course, we want to support President Obama…I have to make sure I am true to the mission of the National Bar.”  If the NBA is supposed to be “non partisan,” why would Thompson say, “of course we want to support President Obama?”

Herein lies the problem with liberal Black groups, they are supporting Kagan’s nomination because the president who nominated her is Black.  Kagan’s nomination presented all the old line civil rights groups a great opportunity to take a principled stand and let the White House know that they were no longer going to be taken for granted.

The NAACP’s Legal Defense and Education Fund endorsed Kagan’s nomination, but yet questioned her record on civil rights.

If a Republican had nominated Kagan, these very same groups would be calling for her nomination to be filibustered.  This is the very reason Obama feels he doesn’t have to do anything specifically for Blacks.  He knows there will be no repercussions if he doesn’t.  Kagan’s nomination is a case in point.

Juxtapose this with the reaction from conservative Republicans when former president George W. Bush nominated Harriet Meirs to the Supreme Court.  Their reaction was swift and forceful—“we will not support her!”  In less than a month’s time, Meirs had withdrawn her nomination.

Just because Obama is Black, doesn’t mean Black groups should be a rubber stamp for what this administration wants.  When will we become more politically sophisticated and less emotional?  What does the Black community have to show for Obama’s presidency so far?  The Hispanics have Sonya Sotomayor on the Supreme Court and are fighting for amnesty for illegals, the gays have a sitting president fighting for gay rights at every turn and Blacks have hope.

Sometimes you have to lose in order to win.  For once I would like to see Blacks force a politician to lose a race or a vote in Congress to prove there are consequences for not being sensitive to our issues.

So, as Kagan’s hearing for the Supreme Court is coming to and end (with her ultimately being seated on the court), Blacks silence has been the loudest sound heard.

Hello, can you hear me now?

Raynard Jackson is president & CEO of Raynard Jackson & Associates, LLC., a D.C.-public relations/government affairs firm.  He is also a contributing editor for ExcellStyle Magazine (www.excellstyle.com).